World Association for Political Economy
WAPE [2007]
No.7
A Statement
On the Political
Economy of the Contemporary Relationship between Capital and Labor in the World
(Approved at the 2nd Session of the 2nd
Board of Directors of World Association for Political Economy on October 27,
2007 and announced at the Closing Plenary of the 2nd Forum of World
Association for Political Economy on October 28, 2007.)
The relation
between labor and capital is the axis on which our entire present system of
society turns. Marx pointed out that labor under capitalism has a dual
character. Labor produces use-values under capitalism, as it does in all modes
of production. However, under capitalism labor also generates value and surplus
value. Capital appropriates the surplus value, a process referred to as
exploitation of labor. The exploitation of labor by capital is the fundamental
class contradiction of capitalism, although of course capitalism has other,
related contradictions such as a tendency to destroy nature.
In
contemporary society, not all labor is performed directly for private capital.
Labor also takes place within other social relations, including labor in the
domestic sphere, in state agencies, state-owned enterprises, worker-owned
enterprises, collective enterprises, cooperatives, and individual labor by
independent producers. The mode of production of private capital employing
wage-labor is the dominant mode of production in the world today, and the
capital-labor relation plays a central role in determining the character and
evolution of the global politics, economy, and culture.
Bourgeois
(mainstream) economics claims that there is no exploitation in a competitive capitalist
private economy. According to that view, employers and employees both receive
the equivalent of what they contribute to production and also just compensation
for what they sacrifice in production. This claim, which has no sound basis,
serves to obscure the exploitation upon which capitalism is based. It leads to
the mistaken view that the route to improved conditions for the working class
lies in individual actions such as getting more education and a willingness to
work harder. While such pursuits can lead to advancement by individual workers
relative to their fellow workers, they cannot end the manipulation and
exploitation of the working class as a whole.
The basic
tendency of capitalist private enterprise is to drive wages down toward the
lowest possible level while increasing the length and intensity of working time
to the greatest extent possible. This tendency, which operates freely in many
areas of the world today, derives from capital's goal of maximizing profits. It
can be checked by the struggles of workers to have time and energy for
themselves and to satisfy socially generated needs. At the same time, the
standard of living of the working class in developed capitalist countries is
also influenced by other factors including unequal exchange between developed
and developing countries.
Marxist
political economy does not believe in any iron law of bare subsistence wages.
Although workers have been able to improve their conditions within the
capitalist private economy, this can only be realized through their own
economic and political organization, because the proportion of what workers can
get from what they have created depends on their economic and political power
within the capitalist system.
While a high
degree of inequality is inherent in capitalism because of exploitation of labor
and other aspects of capitalism, in certain countries during certain periods
the working class has made significant gains within the capitalist system. This
includes high and rising real wages, reduced working hours, improved working
conditions, comprehensive social programs, and significant economic and social
rights guaranteed through the state and in direct capital-labor contracts. This
was prevalent in many countries during the quarter-century following World War
II. However, during that period the ability of workers in the industrialized
countries to gain rising wages was also partly due to imperialist domination and
unequal exchange.
During the
past half-century, capitalism has witnessed a transformation in the role of female
labor, as in much of the world female labor has shifted from predominantly
domestic labor to wage labor. This transformation was partly a result of the
struggle of women and is ultimately a progressive development, but the manner
in which this transformation has taken place has caused problems for both
female and male workers, particularly in relation to the conflicting demands of
paid work and domestic responsibilities. In some countries state programs have
eased this conflict, while in others little has been done about it.
Since around
1980, the start of the so-called neoliberal era , the general trend in
capital-labor relations in the world has been one of backward movement rather
than advance in workers' conditions. In many countries real wages have
stagnated or declined; working hours have stopped falling or have increased in
fact, at the same time that unemployment has increased; job security has
declined; job safety and health have worsened; social programs that benefit
workers have been cut back or eliminated; and hard-won economic and social
rights have been undermined. These attacks on workers’ rights and benefits not
only harm the working class directly but also contain the seeds of economic
crises.
Some argue
that these unfavorable developments for workers are necessary for economic
progress. We reject such claims, which have no sound basis. We note that
economic progress was more rapid in the capitalist world as a whole during the
quarter-century following World War II than in the neoliberal era. However, the
relatively faster economic progress in the former period does not mean that the
state-regulated form of capitalism resolves all the contradictions of
capitalism.
Marxist
political economists must analyze the reasons for labor's deteriorating
conditions in the neoliberal era and propose ways to reverse this process.
Among the factors that bear further study in this regard are the following:
1) The particular capitalist form of increased global
economic integration in this period, which has undermined workers' bargaining
power.
2) The disappearance of most of the socialist countries,
whose existence had exercised a check on capital's ability to drive down
workers' conditions in capitalist countries.
3) The weakening of Communist, Socialist, and other left-wing
groups in the capitalist countries, and in some cases the abandonment of the
defense of workers' interests by formerly left-wing parties.
4) The weakening of the workers' movement in many capitalist
countries.
5) Deregulation, privatization, cutbacks in or elimination of
social programs, a shift from progressive to regressive forms of taxation,
attacks on trade unions, and the “casualization” of labor -- all advocated by
neoliberalism.
6) Renewal of the workers' movement and resistance to neoliberal
policies by ordinary people.
While we
support all reforms within all countries that would improve the conditions of
the working class and other oppressed groups, we also support the final
elimination of the exploitation of labor by replacing capitalism with
socialism. Only in a socialist system can production be fully organized to meet
the varied needs of human beings, which include the right to work, safe and
healthy working conditions which are controlled by the workers themselves,
reasonable work hours, a comfortable living standard, economic security from
birth through old age, paid work that is flexible to accommodate the needs of
raising children and caring for the elderly, and the elimination of all forms
of discrimination at work and in society in general.
Marx wrote
that, as the mass of misery, oppression, slavery, degradation, and exploitation
grows, the revolt of the working-class also grows. As Marxist political
economists, we are, corresponding with the modern real conditions, ready to use
our scholarly training in support of movements and organizations that defend
and advance the short-run and/or the long-run interests of the working class
and other oppressed groups.